Kenya’s ex-President Daniel arap Moi ordered to pay for land seize

Daniel arap MoiPicture copyright
Getty Photos

Picture caption

Daniel arap Moi was president for 24 years

A court docket in Kenya has ordered former President Daniel arap Moi to pay 1.06bn shillings ($10.5m; £eight.2m) in compensation to a widow for illegally seizing her land.

Mr Moi transferred to himself 53 acres of land belonging to widow Susan Cheburet Chelugui, the choose dominated.

The land was illegally grabbed 36 years in the past however solely transferred to Mr Moi’s title in 2007.

Ms Chelugui’s husband Noah Chelugui was a neighborhood chief throughout Mr Moi’s rule.

The previous president, who stays Kenya’s longest-serving chief, was accused by Ms Chelugui and her son David Chelugui of transferring their household land into his title two years after Ms Chelugui’s husband handed away.

You may additionally be desirous about:

Mr Moi is then mentioned to have bought the land to Rai Plywood Restricted, a timber agency, the BBC’s Mercy Juma stories from Nairobi.

Rai Plywood Restricted advised the choose that it had purchased the land from Moi in 2007 after thorough authorized checks.

Nonetheless, Mr Moi was unable to supply the court docket any proof of how he got here to own the land, our correspondent says.

Choose Anthony Ombwayo mentioned Mr Moi had behaved in a approach that was “unconstitutional, irregular, unprocedural” and “tainted”.

Mr Moi turned Kenya’s second president in 1978 and served till 2002.

He dominated the nation with an iron fist and was accused of human rights abuses.

Underneath worldwide strain, he allowed multi-party elections in 1992, which had been marred by widespread violence and allegations of rigging.

A test-case for Kenya’s many land grabs?

By Mercy Juma, BBC Africa, Nairobi

This ruling is massively important for Kenya.

There have been quite a few circumstances of land grabbing by high-ranking authorities officers and rich enterprise folks over time however the victims usually have neither the need nor the cash to combat again.

Corruption within the judiciary is one other big downside. When disputes are taken to court docket, they usually drag on for a few years.

Many hope that this can come to be seen as a check case and that it’s going to ship a message to highly effective folks that they will not merely seize land belonging to the much less well-off.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.